<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog</title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com</link>
<description>Autoblog</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[By the Numbers - August 2008: New Digs Edition]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/09/03/by-the-numbers-august-2008-new-digs-edition/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/09/03/by-the-numbers-august-2008-new-digs-edition/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/09/03/by-the-numbers-august-2008-new-digs-edition/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/by-the-numbers/" rel="tag">By the Numbers</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/09/hill_car1a.png" alt="" />Check it out. We've completely revamped By the Numbers to convey more sales information than before in a much easier to digest way. Now we'll be reporting both the change in monthly sales volume for each brand and automaker as well as the change in their Daily Sales Rate or average number of vehicles sold per day. On to the armchair analysis... <br /><br />Poor sales continued through the month of August as only a handful of brands are able to brag about increased sales. <strong>Nissan North America</strong> bucked the trend entirely reporting a 13.6% gain for the combined brands of Nissan and Infiniti with each marque reporting its own individual increases. Credit goes to <strong>VW</strong> (2.9%), as well, which posted a solid number, and the <strong>BMW Group</strong> (1.0%), which barely earned a positive increase in sales thanks to a strong 34.1% increase in <strong>MINI</strong> sales. <br /><br />While <strong>GM</strong> (-20.4%), <strong>FoMoCo</strong> (-25.6%) and <strong>Chrysler LLC</strong> (-34.5%) sales were all down in a big way, <strong>Toyota MoCo </strong>and <strong>Honda America</strong> were also not immune falling 9.4% and 7.3%, respectively. In this environment, brands should consider a single-digit drop a small victory considering the majority of brands that fell by 10% or more.<br /><br /><style type="text/css"> #comparechart { border: 2px solid #333; border-collapse: collapse; } #comparechart td { padding: 3px; border: 1px solid #ccc; vertical-align: top; margin: 0; line-height: 1.3em; font-size: 80%} #comparechart th { font-size: 80%; font-weight: bold; text-align: left; padding: 4px; background: #eee; } #comparechart th.mainth { font-size: 75%; border-bottom: 1px solid #333; } #comparechart td.red { background-color: #f08c85; } #comparechart td.green { background-color: #b3e2c4; } #comparechart td.yellow { background-color: #ffffcc;} </style>
<table width="450" height="112" cellspacing="0" id="comparechart">
    <tbody>
        <tr>
            <th colspan="7">BY THE NUMBERS - August 2008</th>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <th class="mainth">Brand</th> <th class="mainth">Vol.<br /></th> <th class="mainth">Total Vol. 8/08</th> <th class="mainth">Total Vol. 8/07</th> <th class="mainth">DSR<br /></th> <th class="mainth">Daily avg 8/08</th> <th class="mainth">Daily avg 8/07</th>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td><strong>Acura<br /></strong></td>
            <td class="red">-8.2%</td>
            <td>15,089</td>
            <td>16,436</td>
            <td class="red">-8.2%</td>
            <td>559</td>
            <td>609</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top"><strong>Audi</strong></td>
            <td class="red">-15.9%</td>
            <td valign="top">6,406</td>
            <td valign="top">7,620</td>
            <td class="red">-15.9%</td>
            <td valign="top">237</td>
            <td valign="top">282</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top"><strong>BMW</strong></td>
            <td class="red">-4.1% </td>
            <td valign="top">25,462</td>
            <td valign="top">26,562 </td>
            <td class="red">-4.1% </td>
            <td valign="top">943 </td>
            <td valign="top">984 </td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top"><strong>Buick</strong></td>
            <td class="red">-7.7% </td>
            <td valign="top">17,833 </td>
            <td valign="top">19,324 </td>
            <td class="red">-7.7% </td>
            <td valign="top">660 </td>
            <td valign="top">716 </td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top"><strong>Cadillac</strong></td>
            <td class="red">-20.9% </td>
            <td valign="top">15,405 </td>
            <td valign="top">19,481 </td>
            <td class="red">-20.9% </td>
            <td valign="top">571 </td>
            <td valign="top">722 </td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top"><strong>Chevrolet</strong></td>
            <td class="red">-19.2% </td>
            <td valign="top">185,080 </td>
            <td valign="top">229,012 </td>
            <td class="red">-19.2% </td>
            <td valign="top">6,855 </td>
            <td valign="top">8,482 </td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top"><strong>Chrysler</strong></td>
            <td class="red">-44.2% </td>
            <td valign="top">24,337 </td>
            <td valign="top">43,650 </td>
            <td class="red">-44.2% </td>
            <td valign="top">901 </td>
            <td valign="top">1,617 </td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top"><strong>Dodge</strong></td>
            <td class="red">-24.6% </td>
            <td valign="top">62,422 </td>
            <td valign="top">82,841 </td>
            <td class="red">-24.6% </td>
            <td valign="top">2,312 </td>
            <td valign="top">3,068 </td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top"><strong>Ford</strong></td>
            <td class="red">-26.2% </td>
            <td valign="top">133,088 </td>
            <td valign="top">180,282 </td>
            <td class="red">-26.1% </td>
            <td valign="top">4,929 </td>
            <td valign="top">6,677 </td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top"><strong>GMC</strong></td>
            <td class="red">-17.6% </td>
            <td valign="top">42,194 </td>
            <td valign="top">51,222 </td>
            <td class="red">-17.6% </td>
            <td valign="top">1,563 </td>
            <td valign="top">1,897 </td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top"><strong>Honda</strong></td>
            <td class="red">-7.2%</td>
            <td valign="top">131,766</td>
            <td valign="top">141,906</td>
            <td class="red">-7.2%</td>
            <td valign="top">4,880</td>
            <td valign="top">5,256</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top"><strong>HUMMER</strong></td>
            <td class="red">-62% </td>
            <td valign="top">2,160 </td>
            <td valign="top">5,677 </td>
            <td class="red">-62% </td>
            <td valign="top">80 </td>
            <td valign="top">210 </td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top"><strong>Hyundai</strong></td>
            <td class="red">-8.8% </td>
            <td valign="top">41,130 </td>
            <td valign="top">45,087 </td>
            <td class="red">-8.8% </td>
            <td valign="top">1,523 </td>
            <td valign="top">1,670 </td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top"><strong>Infiniti</strong></td>
            <td class="green">8.0% </td>
            <td valign="top">11,076 </td>
            <td valign="top">10,252 </td>
            <td class="green">8.0% </td>
            <td valign="top">410 </td>
            <td valign="top">378 </td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top"><strong>Jeep</strong></td>
            <td class="red">-43.7% </td>
            <td valign="top">23,476 </td>
            <td valign="top">41,712 </td>
            <td class="red">-43.7% </td>
            <td valign="top">869 </td>
            <td valign="top">1,545 </td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top"><strong>Kia</strong></td>
            <td class="red">-6.7% </td>
            <td valign="top">25,065 </td>
            <td valign="top">26,874 </td>
            <td class="red">-6.7% </td>
            <td valign="top">928 </td>
            <td valign="top">995 </td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top"><strong>Lexus</strong></td>
            <td class="red">-9.1% </td>
            <td valign="top">29,281 </td>
            <td valign="top">32,199 </td>
            <td class="red">-9.1% </td>
            <td valign="top">1,084 </td>
            <td valign="top">1,193 </td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top"><strong>Lincoln</strong></td>
            <td class="red">-8.5% </td>
            <td valign="top">9,540 </td>
            <td valign="top">10,423 </td>
            <td class="red">-8.5% </td>
            <td valign="top">353 </td>
            <td valign="top">386 </td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top"><strong>Mazda</strong></td>
            <td class="red">-4.4% </td>
            <td valign="top">23,680 </td>
            <td valign="top">24,762 </td>
            <td class="red">-4.4% </td>
            <td valign="top">877 </td>
            <td valign="top">917 </td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top"><strong>Mercedes-Benz</strong></td>
            <td class="red">-11.8% </td>
            <td valign="top">18,507 </td>
            <td valign="top">20,980 </td>
            <td class="red">-11.8% </td>
            <td valign="top">685 </td>
            <td valign="top">777 </td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top"><strong>Mercury</strong></td>
            <td class="red">-31.7% </td>
            <td valign="top">8,393 </td>
            <td valign="top">12,296 </td>
            <td class="red">-31.7% </td>
            <td valign="top">311 </td>
            <td valign="top">455 </td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top"><strong>MINI</strong></td>
            <td class="green">34.1% </td>
            <td valign="top">5,469 </td>
            <td valign="top">4,077 </td>
            <td class="green">34.1% </td>
            <td valign="top">203 </td>
            <td valign="top">151 </td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top"><strong>Mitsubishi</strong></td>
            <td class="red">-29.3% </td>
            <td valign="top">9,200 </td>
            <td valign="top">13,020 </td>
            <td class="red">-29.3% </td>
            <td valign="top">341 </td>
            <td valign="top">482 </td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top"><strong>Nissan</strong></td>
            <td class="green">14.2% </td>
            <td valign="top">97,417 </td>
            <td valign="top">85,275 </td>
            <td class="green">14.2% </td>
            <td valign="top">3,608 </td>
            <td valign="top">3,158 </td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top"><strong>Pontiac</strong></td>
            <td class="red">-38.3% </td>
            <td valign="top">24,257 </td>
            <td valign="top">39,324 </td>
            <td class="red">-38.3% </td>
            <td valign="top">898 </td>
            <td valign="top">1,456 </td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top"><strong>Porsche</strong></td>
            <td class="red">-44.9% </td>
            <td valign="top">1,404 </td>
            <td valign="top">2,548 </td>
            <td class="red">-44.9% </td>
            <td valign="top">52 </td>
            <td valign="top">94 </td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top"><strong>Saab</strong></td>
            <td class="red">-50.1% </td>
            <td valign="top">1,503 </td>
            <td valign="top">3,011 </td>
            <td class="red">-50.1% </td>
            <td valign="top">56 </td>
            <td valign="top">112 </td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top"><strong>Saturn</strong></td>
            <td class="red">-3.5% </td>
            <td valign="top">20,385 </td>
            <td valign="top">21,117 </td>
            <td class="red">-3.5% </td>
            <td valign="top">755 </td>
            <td valign="top">782 </td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top"><strong>Subaru</strong></td>
            <td class="green">14.2% </td>
            <td valign="top">18,932 </td>
            <td valign="top">16,573 </td>
            <td class="green">14.2% </td>
            <td valign="top">701 </td>
            <td valign="top">614 </td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top"><strong>Suzuki</strong></td>
            <td class="red">-31.7% </td>
            <td valign="top">6,083 </td>
            <td valign="top">8,916 </td>
            <td class="red">-31.7% </td>
            <td valign="top">225 </td>
            <td valign="top">330 </td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top"><strong>Toyota</strong></td>
            <td class="red">-9.4% </td>
            <td valign="top">182,252 </td>
            <td valign="top">201,272 </td>
            <td class="red">-9.4% </td>
            <td valign="top">6,750 </td>
            <td valign="top">7,455 </td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top"><strong>Volkswagen</strong></td>
            <td class="green">2.9% </td>
            <td valign="top">22,292 </td>
            <td valign="top">21,655 </td>
            <td class="green">2.9% </td>
            <td valign="top">826 </td>
            <td valign="top">802 </td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top"><strong>Volvo</strong></td>
            <td class="red">-48.8% </td>
            <td valign="top">4,669 </td>
            <td valign="top">9,119 </td>
            <td class="red">-48.8% </td>
            <td valign="top">173 </td>
            <td valign="top">338 </td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td class="yellow"> <strong>COMPANIES</strong></td>
            <td class="yellow"> </td>
            <td class="yellow"> </td>
            <td class="yellow"> </td>
            <td class="yellow"> </td>
            <td class="yellow"> </td>
            <td class="yellow"> </td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top"><strong>BMW Group</strong></td>
            <td class="green">1%</td>
            <td valign="top">30,931</td>
            <td valign="top">30,639</td>
            <td class="green">1%</td>
            <td valign="top">1,146</td>
            <td valign="top">1,135</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top"><strong>Chrysler LLC</strong></td>
            <td class="red">-34.5% </td>
            <td valign="top">110,235 </td>
            <td valign="top">168,203 </td>
            <td class="red">-34.5% </td>
            <td valign="top">4,083 </td>
            <td valign="top">6,230 </td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top"><strong>FoMoCo</strong></td>
            <td class="red">-25.6% </td>
            <td valign="top">151,021 </td>
            <td valign="top">203,001 </td>
            <td class="red">-25.6% </td>
            <td valign="top">5,593 </td>
            <td valign="top">7,519 </td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top"><strong>General Motors</strong></td>
            <td class="red">-20.4% </td>
            <td valign="top">308,817 </td>
            <td valign="top">388,168 </td>
            <td class="red">-20.4% </td>
            <td valign="top">11,438 </td>
            <td valign="top">14,377 </td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top"><strong>Honda America</strong></td>
            <td class="red">-7.3%</td>
            <td valign="top">146,855</td>
            <td valign="top">158,342</td>
            <td class="red">-7.3%</td>
            <td valign="top">5,439</td>
            <td valign="top">5,864</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top"><strong>Nissan NA</strong></td>
            <td class="green">13.6% </td>
            <td valign="top">108,493 </td>
            <td valign="top">95,527 </td>
            <td class="green">13.6% </td>
            <td valign="top">4,018 </td>
            <td valign="top">3,538 </td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top"><strong>Toyota Mo Co</strong></td>
            <td class="red">-9.4%</td>
            <td valign="top">211,533 </td>
            <td valign="top">233,471 </td>
            <td class="red">-9.4% </td>
            <td valign="top">7,835 </td>
            <td valign="top">8,647 </td>
        </tr>
    </tbody>
</table>
<small><em>August 2008 had 27 selling days versus 27 selling days for August 2007<br /><br /></em><strong>UPDATE:</strong><em> Audi added and Subaru's sales figures corrected.</em></small><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;">&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/09/03/by-the-numbers-august-2008-new-digs-edition/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1303437/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/09/03/by-the-numbers-august-2008-new-digs-edition/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p><hr />]]></description><category>august 2008 auto sales</category><category>august 2008 sales</category><category>August2008AutoSales</category><category>August2008Sales</category><category>by the numbers</category><category>ByTheNumbers</category><category>featured</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Neff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>2008-09-03T16:23:00+00:00</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[By the Numbers July 2008: Everybody Hurts Edition]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/08/01/by-the-numbers-july-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/08/01/by-the-numbers-july-2008/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/08/01/by-the-numbers-july-2008/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/by-the-numbers/" rel="tag">By the Numbers</a></p><span style="font-weight: bold;">NOTE: </span><span style="font-style: italic;">There were 26 selling days in July 2008 versus 24 selling days in July 2007. All percentages are the change in the average number of vehicles sold per day or Daily Sales Rate (DSR), <span style="font-weight: bold;">not</span> the difference in actual number of vehicles sold for each month.<span style="font-weight: bold;"><br /><br /></span></span><span style="font-weight: bold;"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/08/hill_car1a.png" /></span>This is an easy month of sales to report. Every brand and automaker sold fewer vehicles per day on average in July 2008 versus July 2007 except for Mercedes-Benz, MINI, Nissan and Nissan North America. <br /><br />Of the major automakers, Chrysler LLC's average daily sales fell 34% while General Motors saw a 32.4% drop. FoMoCo saw its DSR fall 21.5%, and even Toyota felt the pain to the tune of an -18.7%. Nissan North America did post positive numbers, but just barely at 0.12%. <br /><br />Some model specific news: The Ford F-150 is back to being the best-selling vehicle in the U.S. with July sales of 44,289. Check out the Top 10 at <a href="http://blogs.cars.com/kickingtires/2008/08/ford-f-series-r.html">KickingTires Blog</a>. Also, shortages in nickel-metal hydride batteries have once again kept Prius sales around 15,000 units/month, and though the Focus is selling well (up 26.2% so far this year), Toyota still sold twice as many units of the Corolla/Matrix last month (15,200 vs. 34,438). <br /><span style="font-style: italic;"><span style="font-weight: bold;"></span></span><span style="font-weight: bold;"></span><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">Biggest Winner</span><br /> <span style="font-weight: bold;">MINI<img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/08/__up_arrow.jpg" /></span>14.9% at 5,063 | 195/day<br /> (7/07: 4,069 | 170/day)<br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">Biggest Loser</span><br /> <span style="font-weight: bold;">HUMMER<img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/08/__down_arrow.jpg" /></span>-65% at 1,877 | 72/day<br /> (7/07: 4,895 | 204/day)<br /><span style="font-weight: bold;"></span><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">AUTOMAKERS</span><br /> <span style="font-weight: bold;">BMW Group<img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/08/__down_arrow.jpg" /></span>-5.7% at 28,977 | 1,114/day<br />(7/07: 28,364 | 1182/day)<br /> <span style="font-weight: bold;">Chrysler LLC<img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/08/__down_arrow.jpg" /></span>-34% at 98,109 | 3,773/day<br />(7/07: 137,728 | 5,739/day)<br /> <span style="font-weight: bold;">Ford Motor Co<img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/08/__down_arrow.jpg" /></span>-21.5% at 161,530 | 6,213/day<br />(7/07: 189,920 | 7,913/day)<br style="font-weight: bold;" /> <span style="font-weight: bold;">General Motors<img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/08/__down_arrow.jpg" /></span>-32.4% at 235,184 | 9,046/day<br />(7/07: 320,935 | 13,372/day)<br style="font-weight: bold;" /> <span style="font-weight: bold;">Honda America<img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/08/__down_arrow.jpg" /></span>-9.2% at 138,744 | 5,336/day <br />(7/07: 141,049 | 5,877/day)<br style="font-weight: bold;" /> <span style="font-weight: bold;">Nissan North America<img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/08/__up_arrow.jpg" /></span>0.12% at 95,319 | 3,666/day<br />(7/07: 87,877 | 3661/day)<br /> <span style="font-weight: bold;">Toyota Motor Co.<img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/08/__down_arrow.jpg" /></span>-18.7% at 197,424 | 7,593/day<br />(7/07: 224,058 | 9,336/day)<br /><br /><span style="font-style: italic;">Follow the jump view the sales performance for individual <span style="font-weight: bold;">BRANDS</span>.</span><p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/08/01/by-the-numbers-july-2008/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>By the Numbers July 2008: Everybody Hurts Edition</em></a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;">&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/08/01/by-the-numbers-july-2008/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1273292/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/08/01/by-the-numbers-july-2008/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p><hr />]]></description><category>by the number july 2008</category><category>by the numbers</category><category>ByTheNumberJuly2008</category><category>ByTheNumbers</category><category>featured</category><category>july 2008 sales</category><category>July2008Sales</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Neff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>2008-08-01T16:59:00+00:00</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[By the Numbers June 2008: Not That Bad Edition]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/07/01/by-the-numbers-june-2008-not-that-bad-edition/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/07/01/by-the-numbers-june-2008-not-that-bad-edition/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/07/01/by-the-numbers-june-2008-not-that-bad-edition/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/by-the-numbers/" rel="tag">By the Numbers</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/07/hill_car1a.png" />You're going to be reading in the mainstream press about how horrible sales were in the U.S. during June, 2008. Yes, they were bad for many automakers, but consider that there were only 24 selling days last month versus 27 days in June, 2007. This makes comparing raw sales numbers misleading, since there were three fewer days to sell. Thus, as always, all the percentages below represent the <span style="font-style: italic; font-weight: bold;">change in Daily Sales Rate</span>, i.e. the average number of vehicles sold per day, not the change in raw number of vehicles sold.<br /><br />The big news is how hard Toyota fell last month, its DSR dropping 11.5% as a whole while the Toyota brand itself fell 10.3%. Cross-island rival Honda, however, bucked that trend by improving its DSR a whopping 13.8% and 17.9% for the Honda brand alone. Among the domestics, General Motors fared best with its DSR falling only 8.3%. If you look closely at the list below, while HUMMER, Saab and GMC were down in the big double digits, GM's volume brands held their own and most were down less than 5%. Ford, meanwhile, dropped its DSR by 19.1% (note this is the first month Jaguar and Land Rover sales were not included in Ford's numbers), and Chrysler, LLC, which performed the worst, saw its DSR plunge 28%. As you can see, however, many brands found a way to make it work in June, with Audi, MINI, Hyundai, Kia, Mazda, Mercedes-Benz, Subaru, Suzuki and Volkswagen all up in a big way.<br /><br /><strong>Biggest Winner</strong><br />MINI <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/07/__up_arrow.jpg" />40.5% at 5,211 (6/07: 4,174)<br /><br /><strong>Biggest Loser</strong><br />HUMMER <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/07/__down_arrow.jpg" />-54.2% at 2,072 (6/07: 5,093)<br /><br /><strong>BRANDS</strong><br />Acura <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/07/__down_arrow.jpg" />-16.4% at 12,456 (6/07: 16,766)<br />Audi <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/07/__up_arrow.jpg" />18.5% at 8,203 (6/07: 7,789)<br />BMW <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/07/__down_arrow.jpg" />-6.6% at 20,944 (6/07: 25,220)<br />Buick <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/07/__down_arrow.jpg" />-34.4% at 9,631 (6/07: 16,519)<br />Cadillac <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/07/__down_arrow.jpg" />-3.1% at 14,337 (6/07: 16,647)<br />Chevrolet <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/07/__down_arrow.jpg" />-3.5% at 159,998 (6/07: 186,474)<br />Chrysler <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/07/__down_arrow.jpg" />-36% at 27,128 (6/07: 47,658)<br />Dodge <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/07/__down_arrow.jpg" />-21.3% at 63,687 (6/07: 91,089)<br />Ford <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/07/__down_arrow.jpg" />-19.8% at 145,715 (6/07: 204,303)<br />GMC <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/07/__down_arrow.jpg" />-14.6% at 30,713 (6/07: 40,457)<br />Honda <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/07/__up_arrow.jpg" />17.9% at 130,083 (6/07: 124,169)<br />HUMMER <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/07/__down_arrow.jpg" />-54.2% at 2,072 (6/07: 5,093)<br />Hyundai <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/07/__up_arrow.jpg" />14% at 50,033 (6/07: 49,368)<br />Infiniti <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/07/__down_arrow.jpg" />-0.9% at 9,304 (6/07: 10,558)<br />Jeep <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/07/__down_arrow.jpg" />-32.8% at 26,642 (6/07: 44,600)<br />Kia <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/07/__up_arrow.jpg" />21% at 28,292 (6/07: 26,288)<br />Lexus <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/07/__down_arrow.jpg" />-21% at 20,253 (6/07: 28,869)<br />Lincoln <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/07/__down_arrow.jpg" />-12.5% at 9,718 (6/07: 12,494)<br />Mazda <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/07/__up_arrow.jpg" />3.8% at 23,771 (6/07: 25,761)<br />Mercedes-Benz <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/07/__up_arrow.jpg" />12.4% at 19,576 (6/07: 19,589)<br />Mercury <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/07/__down_arrow.jpg" />-16.3% at 11,657 (6/07: 15,660)<br />MINI <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/07/__up_arrow.jpg" />40.5% at 5,211 (6/07: 4,174)<br />Mitsubishi <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/07/__down_arrow.jpg" />-35.2% at 7,494 (6/07: 13,014)<br />Nissan <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/07/__down_arrow.jpg" />-8.3% at 66,543 (6/07: 81,655)<br />Pontiac <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/07/__down_arrow.jpg" />-5.1% at 28,402 (6/07: 33,683)<br />Porsche <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/07/__down_arrow.jpg" />-8.7% at 2,650 (6/07: 3,267)<br />Saab <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/07/__down_arrow.jpg" />-51.7% at 1,872 (6/07: 4,361)<br />Saturn <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/07/__down_arrow.jpg" />-1.9% at 18,912 (6/07: 21,686)<br />Subaru <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/07/__up_arrow.jpg" />18.4% at 18,007 (6/07: 17,108)<br />Suzuki <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/07/__up_arrow.jpg" />6.6% at 9,785 (6/07: 10,325)<br />Toyota <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/07/__down_arrow.jpg" />-10.3% at 172,981 (6/07: 216,870)<br />Volkswagen <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/07/__up_arrow.jpg" />12.8% at 23,208 (6/07: 23,137)<br />Volvo <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/07/__down_arrow.jpg" />-17.7% at 7,001 (6/07: 9,572)<br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">Not Yet Reported</span><br />Jaguar<br />Land Rover<br /><br /><strong>COMPANIES</strong><br />BMW Group <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/07/__up_arrow.jpg" />0.1% at 26,155 (6/07: 29,394)<br />Chrysler Group <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/07/__down_arrow.jpg" />-28% at 117,457 (6/07: 183,347)<br />Ford Motor Co <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/07/__down_arrow.jpg" />-19.1% at 167,090 (6/07: 232,457)<br />General Motors <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/07/__down_arrow.jpg" />-8.3% at 265,937 (6/07: 326,300)<br />Honda America <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/07/__up_arrow.jpg" />13.8% at 142,539 (6/07: 140,935)<br />Nissan North America <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/07/__down_arrow.jpg" />-7.5% at 75,847 (6/07: 92,213)<br />Toyota Motor Co. <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/07/__down_arrow.jpg" />-11.5% at 193,234 (6/07: 245,739)<p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;">&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/07/01/by-the-numbers-june-2008-not-that-bad-edition/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1242668/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/07/01/by-the-numbers-june-2008-not-that-bad-edition/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p><hr />]]></description><category>by the numbers</category><category>ByTheNumbers</category><category>june 2008 auto sales</category><category>june 2008 sales</category><category>june 2008 u.s. auto sales</category><category>June2008AutoSales</category><category>June2008Sales</category><category>June2008U.s.AutoSales</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Neff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>2008-07-01T17:28:00+00:00</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[By the Numbers May 2008: F-150 Falls Edition]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/06/03/by-the-numbers-may-2008-f-150-falls-edition/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/06/03/by-the-numbers-may-2008-f-150-falls-edition/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/06/03/by-the-numbers-may-2008-f-150-falls-edition/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/by-the-numbers/" rel="tag">By the Numbers</a></p><strong>Honda Civic, Accord, Toyota Camry and Corolla all outsell Ford F-150 for the first time</strong><br /><br /><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/06/hill_car1a.png" />The two brands who lost and gained the most sales last month (MINI and HUMMER) sum up nicely what happened to auto sales during May in the U.S. Brands armed with small cars weathered the storm and big trucks and SUVs continued to nose dive. In fact, after 17 years worth of being this country's best-selling vehicle, the Ford F-150 full-size pickup (42,973) has fallen for the first time to fifth place behind the Honda Accord (43,728), Toyota Camry (51,291), Corolla (52,826) and your new best-selling vehicle in the U.S., <a href="http://www.carbuyersnotebook.com/archives/2008/06/honda_civic_is_the_best_s.htm">the Honda Civic</a> (53,299). Note to automakers: that would be the sound of the canary in your coal mine hitting the floor. <br /><br />U.S. automakers continued their year of suffering last month (Chrysler LLC had not yet broken down its numbers by brand at the time of posting), with General Motors taking the beating of its life and Chrysler LLC not far behind. Every single GM brand was down not just in the double-digit range, but all were down more than 20% with HUMMER falling off the map at less than 2,000 units sold. FoMoCo was down nearly 20%, but can at least take heart knowing that its new Focus (32,579) has found a lot fans. Toyota was also down, but was buoyed by the aforementioned incredible popularity of the Camry and Corolla. Nissan and Honda were both up, however, with the big 'H' bucking all trends and posting a gain of 11.3%. <br /><strong><br />NOTE:</strong> <em>Because there were 27 selling day in May 2008 versus 26 in May 2007, all percentages represent the change in average Daily Sales Rate, i.e. the average number of vehicles sold per day, rather than the change in raw number of vehicles sold. </em><br /><br /><strong>Biggest Winner</strong><br />MINI <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/06/__up_arrow.jpg" />47.2% at 6,312 (5/07: 4,130)<br /><br /><strong>Biggest Loser</strong><br />HUMMER <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/06/__down_arrow.jpg" />-61.7% at 1,843 (5/07: 4,636)<br /><br /><strong>BRANDS</strong><br />Acura <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/06/__down_arrow.jpg" />-9.9% at 14,893 (5/07: 15,920)<br />Audi <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/06/__down_arrow.jpg" />-6.4% at 8,534 (5/07: 8,788)<br />BMW <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/06/__down_arrow.jpg" />-8.1% at 25,469 (5/07: 26,689) <br />Buick <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/06/__down_arrow.jpg" />-37.8% at 11,033 (5/07: 17,087)<br />Cadillac <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/06/__down_arrow.jpg" />-26% at 13,348 (5/07: 17,380)<br />Chevrolet <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/06/__down_arrow.jpg" />-27.1% at 167,202 (5/07: 220,870)<br />Ford <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/06/__down_arrow.jpg" />-16.6% at 184,402 (5/07: 212,572)<br />GMC <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/06/__down_arrow.jpg" />-38.8% at 30,724 (5/07: 48,336)<br />Honda <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/06/__up_arrow.jpg" />13.9% at 153,104 (5/07: 129,447)<br />HUMMER <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/06/__down_arrow.jpg" />-61.7% at 1,843 (5/07: 4,636)<br />Hyundai <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/06/__up_arrow.jpg" />1.8% at 46,415 (5/07: 43,885)<br />Infiniti <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/06/__down_arrow.jpg" />-6% at 10,495 (5/07: 10,748)<br />Jaguar <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/06/__up_arrow.jpg" />22.7% at 1,757 (5/07: 1,379)<br />Kia <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/06/__up_arrow.jpg" />4.9% at 31,047 (5/07: 28,494)<br />Land Rover <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/06/__down_arrow.jpg" />-32.3% at 3,003 (5/07: 4,269)<br />Lexus <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/06/__down_arrow.jpg" />-19.6% at 26,593 (5/07: 31,847)<br />Lincoln <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/06/__down_arrow.jpg" />-42% at 8,365 (5/07: 13,880)<br />Mazda <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/06/__up_arrow.jpg" />.4% at 27,921 (5/07: 26,788)<br />Mercedes <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/06/__up_arrow.jpg" />8.3% at 24,480 (5/07: 21,771)<br />Mercury <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/06/__down_arrow.jpg" />-28% at 13,593 (5/07: 18,178)<br />MINI <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/06/__up_arrow.jpg" />47.2% at 6,312 (5/07: 4,130)<br />Mitsubishi <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/06/__down_arrow.jpg" />-26% at 10,430 (5/07: 13,651)<br />Nissan <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/06/__up_arrow.jpg" />5.7% at 90,379 (5/07: 82,314)<br />Pontiac <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/06/__down_arrow.jpg" />-25.9% at 27,966 (5/07: 36,325) <br />Porsche <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/06/__down_arrow.jpg" />-20% at 2,796 (5/07: 3,348)<br />Saab <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/06/__down_arrow.jpg" />-28% at 2,148 (5/07: 2,872)<br />Saturn <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/06/__down_arrow.jpg" />-32.7% at 18,099 (5/07: 26,905)<br />Subaru <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/06/__up_arrow.jpg" />9% at 18,436 (5/07: 16,282)<br />Suzuki <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/06/__down_arrow.jpg" />-2% at 10,364 (5/07: 10,190)<br />Toyota <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/06/__down_arrow.jpg" />-6.3% at 230,811 (5/07: 237,176)<br />Volkswagen <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/06/__down_arrow.jpg" />-3.6% at 22,346 (5/07: 22,325)<br />Volvo <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/06/__down_arrow.jpg" />-24% at 7,238 (5/07: 9,192)<br /><br /><strong>Not Yet Reported</strong><br />Chrysler<br />Dodge<br />Jeep<br /><br /><strong>COMPANIES</strong><br />BMW Group <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/06/__down_arrow.jpg" />-0.7% at 31,781 (5/07: 30,819)<br />Chrysler Group <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/06/__down_arrow.jpg" />-28% at 148,747 (5/07: 199,393)<br />Ford Motor Co <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/06/__down_arrow.jpg" />-19% at 217,998 (5/07: 259,470)<br />General Motors <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/06/__down_arrow.jpg" />-30% at 272,363 (5/07: 375,682)<br />Honda America <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/06/__up_arrow.jpg" />11.3% at 167,997 (5/07: 145,367)<br />Nissan North America <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/06/__up_arrow.jpg" />4.4% at 100,874 (5/07: 93,062)<br />Toyota Motor Co. <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/06/__down_arrow.jpg" />-7.9% at 257,404 (5/07: 269,023)<p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;">&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/06/03/by-the-numbers-may-2008-f-150-falls-edition/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1214362/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/06/03/by-the-numbers-may-2008-f-150-falls-edition/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p><hr />]]></description><category>by the numbers</category><category>by the numbers may 2008</category><category>ByTheNumbers</category><category>ByTheNumbersMay2008</category><category>f-150 corolla camry civic</category><category>F-150CorollaCamryCivic</category><category>featured</category><category>may 2008 sales</category><category>May2008Sales</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Neff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>2008-06-03T15:59:00+00:00</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[By the Numbers: April 2008]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/05/01/by-the-numbers-april-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/05/01/by-the-numbers-april-2008/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/05/01/by-the-numbers-april-2008/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/by-the-numbers/" rel="tag">By the Numbers</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/05/hill_car1a.png" />Remember when I said <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/04/by-the-numbers-february-2008/">February 2008</a> was the worst month ever in the history of our reporting monthly sales figures? Well, April 2008 was just as bad. Though we had five brands this month that posted an increase in their daily sales rate (DSR) compared to four back in February, automakers had two extra days last month to sell compared to April 2007. Not even that helped as most brands went down flaming with double-digit dips in their DSR*. <br /><br />The domestics were hit the hardest in April, with Ford Motor Company (-19%), General Motors (-22.7%) and Chrysler LLC (-29%) all down. You'll hear from analysts that two things are responsible for the Big 3's poor performance: too many trucks and SUVs that nobody wants combined with a decrease in fleet sales. Nissan North American and Toyota Motor Co. were down as well, but both by less than 5%. Honda informed us it's having technical difficulties reporting its numbers, so they're forthcoming. <br /><br />The significant thing that happened last month is the big jump in small car sales. On a make/model basis, the Ford Focus was up 32%, the Chevy Cobalt and Aveo were up 15.5% and 14%, the Toyota Yaris and Prius rose 45.9% and 53.8%. While virtually all truck and SUV sales were down, as well as those of many larger CUVs, small and mid-size cars were definitely popular with the people. <strong><br /><br />Biggest Winner</strong><br />MINI <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/05/__up_arrow.jpg" />28.6% at 4,713 (4/07: 3,382)<br /><br /><strong>Biggest Loser</strong><br />HUMMER <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/05/__down_arrow.jpg" />-49.8% at 2,380 (4/07: 4,375)<br /><br /><strong>BRANDS</strong><br />Audi <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/05/__down_arrow.jpg" />-12% at 7,730 (4/07: 8,106)<br />BMW <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/05/__down_arrow.jpg" />-2.5% at 26,735 (4/07: 25,310)<br />Buick <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/05/__down_arrow.jpg" />-11.7% at 12,665 (4/07: 13,234)<br />Cadillac <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/05/__down_arrow.jpg" />-21.3% at 14,359 (4/07: 16,839)<br />Chevrolet <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/05/__down_arrow.jpg" />-21.9% at 157,187 (4/07: 185,759)<br />Chrysler <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/05/__down_arrow.jpg" />-45% at 30,670 (4/07: 51,441)<br />Dodge <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/05/__down_arrow.jpg" />-23% at 83,348 (4/07: 100,463)<br />Ford <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/05/__down_arrow.jpg" />-17.4% at 165,997 (4/07: 185,553)<br />GMC <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/05/__down_arrow.jpg" />-29.6% at 31,854 (4/07: 41,748)<br />HUMMER <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/05/__down_arrow.jpg" />-49.8% at 2,380 (4/07: 4,375)<br />Hyundai <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/05/__down_arrow.jpg" />-7.4% at 39,280 (4/07: 39,137)<br />Infiniti <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/05/__down_arrow.jpg" />-11.5% at 9,537 (4/07: 9,945)<br />Jaguar <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/05/__up_arrow.jpg" />15.7% at 1,785 (4/07: 1,424)<br />Jeep <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/05/__down_arrow.jpg" />-24.4% at 33,733 (4/07: 41,200)<br />Land Rover <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/05/__down_arrow.jpg" />-43.9% at 2,557 (4/07: 4,211)<br />Lexus <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/05/__down_arrow.jpg" />-17.1% at 23,350 (4/07: 25,995)<br />Lincoln <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/05/__down_arrow.jpg" />-19.3% at 10,340 (4/07: 11,832)<br />Mazda <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/05/__up_arrow.jpg" />4.1% at 23,760 (4/07: 23,760)<br />Mercedes-Benz <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/05/__down_arrow.jpg" />-10.4% at 20,271 (4/07: 20,895)<br />Mercury <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/05/__down_arrow.jpg" />-31.8% at 12,910 (4/07: 17,481)<br />MINI <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/05/__up_arrow.jpg" />28.6% at 4,713 (4/07: 3,382)<br />Mitsubishi <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/05/__down_arrow.jpg" />-32% at 8,878 (4/07: 12,047)<br />Nissan <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/05/__up_arrow.jpg" />0.1% at 66,318 (4/07: 61,179)<br />Pontiac <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/05/__down_arrow.jpg" />-15.9% at 24,009 (4/07: 26,346)<br />Porsche <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/05/__down_arrow.jpg" />-11.9% at 3,099 (4/07: 3,248)<br />Saab <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/05/__down_arrow.jpg" />-37.9% at 1,580 (4/07: 2,350)<br />Saturn <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/05/__down_arrow.jpg" />-22% at 16,888 (4/07: 19,977)<br />Subaru <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/05/__up_arrow.jpg" />12% at 16,771 (4/07: 13,786)<br />Suzuki <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/05/__down_arrow.jpg" />-2.8% at 9,669 (4/07: 9,179)<br />Toyota <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/05/__down_arrow.jpg" />-2.7% at 194,350 (4/07: 184,462)<br />Volkswagen <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/05/__down_arrow.jpg" />-6.1% at 19,415 (4/07: 19,086)<br />Volvo <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/05/__down_arrow.jpg" />-18.9% at 7,138 (4/07: 8,122)<br /><br />N/A: Kia, Honda and Acura (Delayed)<br /><br /><strong>COMPANIES</strong><br />BMW Group <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/05/__up_arrow.jpg" />1.2% at 31,448 (4/07: 28,692)<br />Chrysler LLC <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/05/__down_arrow.jpg" />-29% at 147,751 (4/07: 193,104)<br />Ford Motor Co <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/05/__down_arrow.jpg" />-19% at 200,727 (4/07: 228,623)<br />General Motors <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/05/__down_arrow.jpg" />-22.7% at 260,922 (4/07: 311,687)<br />Honda America (Delayed)<br />Nissan North America <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/05/__down_arrow.jpg" />-1.6% at 75,855 (4/07: 71,124)<br />Toyota Motor Co. <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/05/__down_arrow.jpg" />-4.5% at 217,700 (4/07: 210,457)<br /><br /><em>*All percentages are reported as the change in Daily Sales Rate because there were 26 selling days in April 2008 versus 24 in April 2007. Comparing the raw number of vehicles sold both months would not be accurate because of this discrepancy in selling days, so we report the change in the average number of vehicles sold per day.</em><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;">&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/05/01/by-the-numbers-april-2008/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1184274/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/05/01/by-the-numbers-april-2008/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p><hr />]]></description><category>april 2008</category><category>April2008</category><category>by the numbers</category><category>by the numbers april</category><category>by the numbers april 2008</category><category>ByTheNumbers</category><category>ByTheNumbersApril</category><category>ByTheNumbersApril2008</category><category>featured</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Neff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>2008-05-01T20:58:00+00:00</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[By the Numbers: March 2008]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/01/by-the-numbers-march-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/01/by-the-numbers-march-2008/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/01/by-the-numbers-march-2008/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/by-the-numbers/" rel="tag">By the Numbers</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/04/hill_car1a.png" alt="" />Though many news outlets will decry March as a horrible sales month in the auto industry, it wasn't that bad and there are some notable successes. The reason it isn't as bad as some will tell you is because most outlets compare the volume of cars sold last month to the same month in 2007, rather than comparing the average number of cars sold per day. Since there were two extra selling days last year (28 vs. 26), looking at the raw numbers is <em>very</em> misleading. All of our numbers below represent the change in the Daily Sales Rate (DSR) rate, so some brands that actually sold less overall did well by selling more cars per day.<br /><br />There's no way, however, to sugarcoat the performance of General Motors and Chrysler LLC last month. Both sold about 13% fewer cars per day than last year. Ford Motor Company, meanwhile, was bolstered by a hot-selling Focus and mitigated the damage to just -7.7%. Toyota Motor Co. also got caught in the crossfire, with avg. sales per day down 3.4%. The BMW Group, Honda America and Nissan North America must've known something (or sold something) the rest didn't, as all improved their DSR last month. <br /><br />We must point out Jaguar, which, thanks to the first month of XF sales, is up for the first time that we can remember. Saab, which has also been consistently flanked by a red arrow, bounced back improving its DSR by 12.4% last month. Volkswagen came out of nowhere with a 21.5% jump, and MINI took the crown of Biggest Winner with a 26.4% rise in its DSR. <br /><br /><strong>Biggest Winner</strong><br />MINI <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/04/__up_arrow.jpg" />26.4% at 4,289 (3/07: 3,655)<br /><br /><strong>Biggest Loser</strong><br />HUMMER <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/04/__down_arrow.jpg" />-23.3% at 3,451 (3/07: 4,847)<br /><br /><strong>BRANDS</strong><br />Acura <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/04/__down_arrow.jpg" />-15.8% at 13,288 (3/07: 16,986)<br />Audi <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/04/__up_arrow.jpg" />7.2% at 7,987 (3/07: 8,020)<br />BMW <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/04/__down_arrow.jpg" />-1.7% at 23,115 (3/07: 25,325)<br />Buick <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/04/__down_arrow.jpg" />-18.2% at 12,317 (3/07: 16,222)<br />Cadillac <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/04/__down_arrow.jpg" />-0.8% at 17,453 (3/07: 18,943)<br />Chevrolet <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/04/__down_arrow.jpg" />-16.9% at 164,564 (3/07: 213,156)<br />Chrysler <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/04/__down_arrow.jpg" />-15.8% at 40,539 (3/07: 51,874)<br />Dodge <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/04/__down_arrow.jpg" />-15.3% at 85,906 (3/07: 109,226)<br />Ford <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/04/__down_arrow.jpg" />-6.7% at 187,828 (3/07: 216,788)<br />GMC <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/04/__up_arrow.jpg" />1.2% at 38,422 (3/07: 40,894)<br />Honda <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/04/__up_arrow.jpg" />6.9% at 125,446 (3/07: 126,406)<br />HUMMER <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/04/__down_arrow.jpg" />-23.3% at 3,451 (3/07: 4,847)<br />Hyundai <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/04/__up_arrow.jpg" />9.8% at 42,796 (3/07: 41,984)<br />Infiniti <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/04/__up_arrow.jpg" />7.3% at 13,821 (3/07: 13,877)<br />Jaguar <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/04/__up_arrow.jpg" />13.2% at 1,752 (3/07: 1,667)<br />Jeep <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/04/__down_arrow.jpg" />-5.1% at 39,941 (3/07: 45,335)<br />Kia <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/04/__down_arrow.jpg" />-2.8% at 24,871 (3/07: 27,567)<br />Land Rover <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/04/__down_arrow.jpg" />-10.2% at 3,054 (3/07: 3,663)<br />Lexus <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/04/__down_arrow.jpg" />-6.9% at 24,939 (3/07: 28,855)<br />Lincoln <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/04/__down_arrow.jpg" />-20.4% at 10,913 (3/07: 14,770)<br />Mazda <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/04/__down_arrow.jpg" />-6.0% at 32,929 (3/07: 37,742)<br />Mercedes <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/04/__up_arrow.jpg" />3.7% at 20,808 (3/07: 21,612)<br />Mercury <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/04/__down_arrow.jpg" />-11.4% at 14,333 (3/07: 17,426)<br />MINI <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/04/__up_arrow.jpg" />26.4% at 4,289 (3/07: 3,655)<br />Mitsubishi <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/04/__down_arrow.jpg" />-7.7% at 10,750 (3/07: 12,536)<br />Nissan <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/04/__up_arrow.jpg" />3.1% at 93,100 (3/07: 97,242)<br />Pontiac <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/04/__down_arrow.jpg" />-10.1% at 25,417 (3/07: 30,448)<br />Porsche <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/04/__down_arrow.jpg" />-13.8% at 2,624 (3/07: 3,278)<br />Saab <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/04/__up_arrow.jpg" />12.4% at 2,962 (3/07: 2,837)<br />Saturn <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/04/__down_arrow.jpg" />-7.5% at 18,146 (3/07: 21,123)<br />Toyota <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/04/__down_arrow.jpg" />-2.9% at 192,791 (3/07: 213,820) <br />Volkswagen <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/04/__up_arrow.jpg" />21.5% at 19,587 (3/07: 17,355)<br />Volvo <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/04/__down_arrow.jpg" />-6.4% at 9,263 (3/07: 10,661)<br /><br /><strong>YET TO REPORT</strong><br />Subaru <br />Suzuki <br /><br /><strong>COMPANIES</strong><br />BMW Group <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/04/__up_arrow.jpg" />1.8% at 27,404 (3/07: 28,980)<br />Chrysler Group <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/04/__down_arrow.jpg" />-13.2% at 166,386 (3/07: 206,435)<br />Ford Motor Co <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/04/__down_arrow.jpg" />-7.7% at 227,143 (3/07: 264,975)<br />General Motors <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/04/__down_arrow.jpg" />-13% at 282,732 (3/07: 349,866)<br />Honda America <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/04/__up_arrow.jpg" />4.2% at 138,734 (3/07: 143,392)<br />Nissan North America <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/04/__up_arrow.jpg" />3.6% at 106,921 (3/07: 111,119)<br />Toyota Motor Co. <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/04/__down_arrow.jpg" />-3.4% at 217,730 (3/07: 242,675)<p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;">&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/01/by-the-numbers-march-2008/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1155033/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/01/by-the-numbers-march-2008/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p><hr />]]></description><category>by the numbers</category><category>by the numbers march 2008</category><category>ByTheNumbers</category><category>ByTheNumbersMarch2008</category><category>march 2008 auto sales</category><category>march sales 2008</category><category>March2008AutoSales</category><category>MarchSales2008</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Neff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>2008-04-01T16:20:00+00:00</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[By the Numbers: February 2008]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/04/by-the-numbers-february-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/04/by-the-numbers-february-2008/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/04/by-the-numbers-february-2008/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/by-the-numbers/" rel="tag">By the Numbers</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/03/hill_car1a.png"  alt="" />February 2008 will go down as the ugliest sales month ever in the history of By the Numbers posts. Out of the 35 brands we track, only four improved their daily average sales rate versus the same month last year: Honda (1.9%), Mazda (2.5%), Mercedes-Benz (3%) and our Biggest Winner, MINI (38.5%). Leap year is to blame, as the rare return of February 29th offered most automakers an extra to day to suck. <br /><br />The big companies themselves fared just as poorly, with every multi-brand automaker except for one down in February compared to last year. Only Honda America scraped together a positive month, increasing its daily average sales rate 0.7% overall. <br /><em><br /></em><strong>NOTE:</strong><em> There were 25 selling days in February 2008 versus 24 selling days in February 2007. As such, all percentages represent the change in daily average sales rate rather than the difference in raw number of units sold. </em><br /><br /><strong>Biggest Winner</strong><br />MINI <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/03/__up_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />38.5% at 3,415 (2/07: 2,368)<br /><br /><strong>Biggest Loser</strong><br />Saturn <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/03/__down_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />-36.1% at 14,801 (2/07: 22,225)<br /><br /><strong>BRANDS</strong><br />Acura <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/03/__down_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />-8.0% at 13,084 (2/07: 13,658)<br />Audi <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/03/__down_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />-10.6% at 6,152 (2/07: 6,609)<br />BMW <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/03/__down_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />-10.5% at 20,775 (2/07: 22,274)<br />Buick <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/03/__down_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />-18.9% at 12,768 (2/07: 15,108)<br />Cadillac <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/03/__down_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />-2.1% at 14,420 (2/07:14,142)<br />Chevrolet <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/03/__down_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />-14.7% at 166,166 (2/07: 187,088)<br />Chrysler <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/03/__down_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />-13.2% at 41,709 (2/07: 46,112)<br />Dodge <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/03/__down_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />-19.35 at 76,141 (2/07: 90,618)<br />Ford <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/03/__down_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />-8.9% at 164,915 (2/07: 173,794)<br />GMC <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/03/__down_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />-22.7% at 33,237 (2/07: 41,279)<br />Honda <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/03/__up_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />1.9% at 102,313 (2/07: 96,368)<br />HUMMER <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/03/__down_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />-22.7% at 3,362 (2/07: 4,177)<br />Hyundai <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/03/__down_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />-13.5% at 31,090 (2/07: 34,500)<br />Infiniti <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/03/__down_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />-0.4% at 10,068 (2/07: 9,704)<br />Jaguar <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/03/__down_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />-14.3% at 1,063 (2/07: 1,191)<br />Jeep <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/03/__down_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />-18% at 32,243 (2/07: 37,776)<br />Kia <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/03/__down_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />-10.2% at 21,988 (2/07: 23,512)<br />Land Rover <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/03/__down_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />-12.9% at 2,819 (2/07: 3,106)<br />Lexus <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/03/__down_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />-9.3% at 21,277 (2/07: 22,518)<br />Lincoln <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/03/__down_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />-14.6% at 9,573 (2/07: <br />Mazda <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/03/__up_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />2.5% at 23,548 (2/07: 22,060)<br />Mercedes <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/03/__up_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />3% at 18,564 (2/07: 17,304)<br />Mercury <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/03/__down_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />-25% at 10,806 (2/07: 13,843)<br />MINI <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/03/__up_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />38.5% at 3,415 (2/07: 2,368)<br />Mitsubishi <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/03/__down_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />-10.1% at 9,105 (2/07: 9,726)<br />Nissan <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/03/__down_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />-3.2% at 76,151 (2/07: 75,514)<br />Pontiac <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/03/__down_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />-6.5% at 23,935 (2/07: 24,563) <br />Porsche <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/03/__down_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />-16.3% at 1,715 (2/07: 1,967)<br />Saab <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/03/__down_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />-25% at 1,734 (2/07: 2,221)<br />Saturn <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/03/__down_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />-36.1% at 14,801 (2/07: 22,225)<br />Subaru <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/03/__down_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />-3.8% at 12,907 (2/07: 12,875)<br />Suzuki <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/03/__down_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />-1.6% at 8,800 (2/07: 8,585)<br />Toyota <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/03/__down_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />-6.3% at 160,892 (2/07: 164,812)<br />Volkswagen <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/03/__down_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />-2.9% at 16,556 (2/07: 16,367)<br />Volvo <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/03/__down_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />-14.8% at 7,505 (2/07: 8,453)<br /><br /><strong>COMPANIES</strong><br />BMW Group <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/03/__down_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />-5.8% at 24,190 (2/07: 24,642)<br />Chrysler Group <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/03/__down_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />-17.4% at 150,093 (2/07: 174,506)<br />Ford Motor Co <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/03/__down_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />-10.6% at 196,681 (2/07: 211,150)<br />General Motors <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/03/__down_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />-16.7% at 270,423 (2/07: 311,763)<br />Honda America <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/03/__up_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />0.7% at 115,397 (2/07: 110,026)<br />Nissan North America <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/03/__down_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />-2.9% at 86,219 (2/07: 85,218)<br />Toyota Motor Co. <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/03/__down_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />-6.6% at 182,169 (2/07: 187,330)<p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;">&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/04/by-the-numbers-february-2008/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1130546/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/04/by-the-numbers-february-2008/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p><hr />]]></description><category>by the numbers</category><category>ByTheNumbers</category><category>february 2008 auto sales</category><category>february 2008 car sales</category><category>february 2008 sales</category><category>February2008AutoSales</category><category>February2008CarSales</category><category>February2008Sales</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Neff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>2008-03-04T12:01:00+00:00</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[By the Numbers: January 2008]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/01/by-the-numbers-january-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/01/by-the-numbers-january-2008/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/01/by-the-numbers-january-2008/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/by-the-numbers/" rel="tag">By the Numbers</a></p><strong>GM starts year off strong, industry as a whole sees lower sales</strong><br /><br /><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/02/hill_car1a.png" alt="" />Analysts and automakers alike have been warning us that 2008 is going to be another tough year, and January only served to prove them right. <br /><br />General Motors, up 2.1%, managed to turn out a remarkably good sales month with every single one of its brands posting positive sales except for Pontiac (UPDATE: and Saab, down 25%, though its total sales are small enough not to affect GM's overall numbers by much). GMC even got a big push from strong Acadia sales (up 335.1% to 7,318) to grab the honor of being our Biggest Winner. <br /><br />Every other automaker, however, saw lower sales last month compared to January 2006, though double-digit drops were avoided by all except Chrysler. Ford Motor Company fell 4.1% in January, a figure that could have been worse were it not for very strong CUV sales and a 44.4% increase in Focus sales to 11,600. Both Toyota Motor Co. and Honda America fell 2.3%, as well. Nissan North America took the second biggest hit with a 7.3% drop in sales. Chrysler, meanwhile, fared that worst with a 12% decline, though it claims this was a result of reduced fleet sales and was expected. <br /><br />Check out sales figures for each individual brand below (the BMW Group and Subaru have not yet reported). Since there 25 selling days in both January 2006 and 2007, the numbers below represent both the percentage change in total number of vehicles sold and daily average sales rate. <br /><br /><strong>Biggest Winner</strong><br />GMC <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/02/__up_arrow.jpg" alt="" />13.3% at 32,270 (1/07: 28,488)<br /><br /><strong>Biggest Loser</strong><br />Jaguar <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/02/__down_arrow.jpg" alt="" />-52.2% at 664 (1/07: 1,390)<br /><strong><br />BRANDS</strong><br />Acura <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/02/__down_arrow.jpg" alt="" />-14.2% at 11,168 (1/07: 13,017)<br />Audi <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/02/__up_arrow.jpg" alt="" />0.3% at 6,418 (1/07: 6,399)<br />Buick <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/02/__up_arrow.jpg" alt="" />6.1% at 12,749 (1/07: 12,013)<br />Cadillac <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/02/__up_arrow.jpg" alt="" />7.7% at 14,792 (1/07: 13,740)<br />Chevrolet <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/02/__up_arrow.jpg" alt="" />0.7% at 149,548 (1/07: 148,449)<br />Chrysler <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/02/__down_arrow.jpg" alt="" />-17% at 34,372 (1/07: 41,486)<br />Dodge <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/02/__down_arrow.jpg" alt="" />-12% at 69,884 (1/07: 79,461)<br />Ford <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/02/__down_arrow.jpg" alt="" />-0.7% at 131,074 (1/07: 132,006)<br />GMC <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/02/__up_arrow.jpg" alt="" />13.3% at 32,270 (1/07: 28,488)<br />Honda <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/02/__down_arrow.jpg" alt="" />-0.5% at 87,343 (1/07: 87,773)<br />HUMMER <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/02/__down_arrow.jpg" alt="" />-23.4% at 3,050 (1/07: 3,980)<br />Hyundai <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/02/__down_arrow.jpg" alt="" />-22.6% at 21,452 (1/07: 27,721)<br />Infiniti <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/02/__down_arrow.jpg" alt="" />-3.6% at 8,644 (1/07: 8,964)<br />Jaguar <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/02/__down_arrow.jpg" alt="" />-52.2% at 664 (1/07: 1,390)<br />Jeep <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/02/__down_arrow.jpg" alt="" />-6.0% at 33,136 (1/07: 35,361)<br />Kia <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/02/__down_arrow.jpg" alt="" />-5.2% at 21,355 (1/07: 22,524)<br />Land Rover <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/02/__down_arrow.jpg" alt="" />-16.7% at 2,859 (1/07: 3,433)<br />Lexus <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/02/__down_arrow.jpg" alt="" />-8.2% at 20,299 (1/07: 22,118)<br />Lincoln <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/02/__down_arrow.jpg" alt="" />-16.8% at 7,985 (1/07: 9,594)<br />Mazda <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/02/__up_arrow.jpg" alt="" />10.2% at 21,212 (1/07: 19,265)<br />Mercedes <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/02/__up_arrow.jpg" alt="" />7.1% at 18,275 (1/07: 17,069)<br />Mercury <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/02/__down_arrow.jpg" alt="" />-26.2% at 9,296 (1/07: 12,604)<br />Mitsubishi <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/02/__down_arrow.jpg" alt="" />-23% at 7,226 (1/07: 9,383) <br />Nissan <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/02/__down_arrow.jpg" alt="" />-7.8% at 67,961 (1/07: 73,680)<br />Pontiac <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/02/__down_arrow.jpg" alt="" />-4.3% at 23,025 (1/07: 24,060) <br />Porsche <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/02/__down_arrow.jpg" alt="" />-13% at 2,595 (1/07: 2,984)<br />Saab <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/02/__down_arrow.jpg" alt="" />-25% at 1,772 (1/07: 2,362)<br />Saturn <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/02/__up_arrow.jpg" alt="" />12.1% at 15,359 (1/07: 13,705)<br />Suzuki <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/02/__down_arrow.jpg" alt="" />-13% at 7,120 (1/07: 8,179)<br />Toyota <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/02/__down_arrow.jpg" alt="" />-1.4% at 151,550 (1/07: 153,732)<br />Volkswagen <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/02/__down_arrow.jpg" alt="" />-13.2% at 14,411 (1/07: 16,610)<br />Volvo <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/02/__up_arrow.jpg" alt="" />2.9% at 8,036 (1/07: 7,808)<br /><br />NA: BMW, MINI, Subaru<br /><strong><br />COMPANIES</strong><br />Chrysler Group <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/02/__down_arrow.jpg" alt="" />-12% at 137,392 (1/07: 156,308)<br />Ford Motor Co <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/02/__down_arrow.jpg" alt="" />-4.1% at 159,914 (1/07: 166,835)<br />General Motors <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/02/__up_arrow.jpg" alt="" />2.1% at 252,565 (1/07: 247,464)<br />Honda America <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/02/__down_arrow.jpg" alt="" />-2.3% at 98,511 (1/07: 100,790)<br />Nissan North America <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/02/__down_arrow.jpg" alt="" />-7.3% at 76,605 (1/07: 82,644)<br />Toyota Motor Co. <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/02/__down_arrow.jpg" alt="" />-2.3% at 171,849 (1/07: 175,850)<p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;">&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/01/by-the-numbers-january-2008/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1104500/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/01/by-the-numbers-january-2008/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p><hr />]]></description><category>by the numbers</category><category>by the numbers january 2008</category><category>ByTheNumbers</category><category>ByTheNumbersJanuary2008</category><category>featured</category><category>january 2008 car sales</category><category>january 2008 sales numbers</category><category>January2008CarSales</category><category>January2008SalesNumbers</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Roth]]></dc:creator><pubDate>2008-02-01T16:56:00+00:00</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[By the Numbers: 2007]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/01/03/by-the-numbers-2007/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/01/03/by-the-numbers-2007/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/01/03/by-the-numbers-2007/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/earnings-financials/" rel="tag">Earnings/Financials</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/by-the-numbers/" rel="tag">By the Numbers</a></p><em><strong>Toyota passes Ford as second largest automaker in the U.S.; Mazda grows the most in 2007 </strong></em><br /><br /><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/hill_car1a.png"  alt="" />The final sales numbers for 2007 are in, and to be honest, they're better than we expected. Of the 34 brands we track sales, 19 showed an improvement in their daily average sales rate last year. The majority of those that didn't, we're sad to say, are either domestic U.S. brands or brands that are owned by a domestic U.S. automaker. <br /><br />Big ups to Mazda, though, which won our coveted Biggest Winner of the Year honor by growing its daily average sales rate 9.8% and selling nearly 300,000 vehicles. We can't say we're surprised that Jaguar is our Biggest Loser of the Year after posting daily average sales rate that fell 24.4% last year. We'd also like to call out Jeep for posting a 3.0% improvement thanks to the hot-selling Wrangler Unlimited, as well as Lincoln, which, despite all odds, increased its daily average sales rate by 8.8% and sold an additional 11,000 vehicles last year. There are other plenty of other proud automakers in the list below we don't have room (or time) to mention. <br /><br />Of course, the biggest news in auto sales for 2007 is that Ford Motor Company was supplanted by Toyota Motor Company as the second largest automaker in the U.S. Toyota sold 2,620,825 units in 2007 compared to Ford's 2,572,599. We weren't all that impressed with ToMoCo's final tally of a 2.7% daily average sales rate increase, but that's all it needed after Ford posted a 12.7% decrease. General Motors, of course, is still well ahead of both with 3,866,620 units sold, while Chrysler could be breathing down Ford's neck with 2,076,650 sales if we expected that number would increase in 2008, which we don't. <br /><br /><em>Note that there were 307 selling days last year compared to 306 selling days in 2006, so the figures below represent the change in daily average sales rate (average number of vehicles sold per day) and not the change in raw number of units sold. </em><br /><strong><br />Biggest Winner of the Year</strong><br />Mazda <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/__up_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />9.8% at 296,110 (2006: 268,786)<br /><br /><strong>Biggest Loser of the Year</strong><br />Jaguar <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/__down_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />-24.4% at 15,683 (2006: 20,683)<br /><br /><strong>BRANDS</strong><br />Acura<img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/__down_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />-10.8% at 180,104 (2006: 201,223)<br />Audi <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/__up_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />3.4% at 93,506 (2006: 90,116)<br />BMW <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/__up_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />6.7% at 293,795 (2006: 274,432)<br />Buick <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/__down_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />-23% at 185,791 (2006: 240,657)<br />Cadillac <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/__down_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />-5.7% at 214,726 (2006: 227,014)<br />Chevrolet <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/__down_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />-6.5% at 2,265,641 (2006: 2,415,428)<br />Chrysler <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/__down_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />-10.5% at 543,011 (2006: 604,874)<br />Dodge <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/__down_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />-2.1% at 1,058,402 (2006: 1,077,579)<br />Ford <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/__down_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />-13.9% at 2,101,244 (2006: 2,433,086)<br />GMC <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/__up_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />4.8% at 505,746 (12/06: 481,222)<br />Honda <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/__up_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />4.5% at 1,371,438 (2006: 1,308,135)<br />HUMMER <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/__down_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />-22% at 55,986 (2006: 71,524)<br />Hyundai <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/__up_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />2.2% at 467,009 (2006: 455,520)<br />Infiniti <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/__up_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />4.5% at 127,038 (2006: 121,146)<br />Jaguar <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/__down_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />-24.4% at 15,683 (2006: 20,683)<br />Jeep <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/__up_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />3.0% at 475,237 (2006: 460,052)<br />Kia <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/__up_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />3.5% at 305,473 (2006: 294,302)<br />Land Rover <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/__up_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />3.4% at 49,550 (2006: 47,774)<br />Lexus <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/__up_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />1.8% at 329,177 (2006: 322,434)<br />Lincoln <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/__up_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />8.8% at 131,487 (2006: 120,476)<br />Mazda <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/__up_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />9.8% at 296,110 (2006: 268,786)<br />Mercedes <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/__up_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />1.8% at 253,433 (2006: 248,080)<br />Mercury <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/__down_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />-7.2% at 168,422 (2006: 180,848)<br />MINI <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/__up_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />7.0% at 42,045 (2006: 39,171)<br />Nissan <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/__up_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />4.5% at 941,200 (2006: 898,103)<br />Pontiac <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/__down_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />-13% at 358,022 (2006: 410,229)<br />Porsche <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/__up_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />1.0% at 34,693 (2006: 34,227)<br />Saab <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/__down_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />-10.3% at 32,711 (2006: 36,349)<br />Saturn <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/__up_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />5.7% at 240,091 (2006: 226,375)<br />Subaru <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/__down_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />-7.0% at 187,208 (2006: 200,703)<br />Suzuki <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/__up_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />0.6% at 101,884 (2006: 100,990)<br />Toyota <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/__up_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />2.9% at 2,291,648 (2006: 2,220,090)<br />Volkswagen <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/__down_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />-2.3 at 230,572 (2006: 235,140)<br />Volvo <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/__down_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />-8.6% at 106,213 (2006: 115,807)<br /><br />NA: Mitsubishi<br /><br /><strong>COMPANIES</strong><br />BMW Group <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/__up_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />6.7% at 335,840 (2006: 313,603)<br />Chrysler Group <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/__down_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />-3.4% at 2,076,650 (2006: 2,142,505)<br />Ford Motor Co <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/__down_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />-12.1% at 2,572,599 (2006: 2,918,674)<br />General Motors <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/__down_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />-6.5% at 3,866,620 (2006: 4,124,645)<br />Honda America <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/__up_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />2.5% at 1,551,542 (2006: 1,509,358)<br />Nissan North America <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/__up_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />4.5% at 1,068,238 (2006: 1,019,249)<br />Toyota Motor Co. <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/__up_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />2.7% at 2,620,825 (2006: 2,542,524)<p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;">&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/01/03/by-the-numbers-2007/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1076724/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/01/03/by-the-numbers-2007/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p><hr />]]></description><category>2007</category><category>auto sales 2007</category><category>AutoSales2007</category><category>by the numbers</category><category>by the numbers 2007</category><category>ByTheNumbers</category><category>ByTheNumbers2007</category><category>featured</category><category>yearly auto sales</category><category>YearlyAutoSales</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Neff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>2008-01-03T17:34:00+00:00</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[By the Numbers: December 2007]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/01/03/by-the-numbers-december-2007/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/01/03/by-the-numbers-december-2007/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/01/03/by-the-numbers-december-2007/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/earnings-financials/" rel="tag">Earnings/Financials</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/by-the-numbers/" rel="tag">By the Numbers</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/hill_car1a.png"  alt="" />Our fingers are bleeding after so much number crunching (look for <strong>By the Numbers: 2007</strong> coming up next). As you can see, the last month of the year was not pretty for most automakers. The number of red arrows in our list below are almost too numerous to count. Mitsubishi, however, took the biggest hit, seeing its sales fall off 40.4% compared to last December. <br /><br />Moving right along to the major automakers, Ford Motor Company and General Motors both saw declines last month, with sales shrinking 9.2% and 5.2%, respectively. Chrysler LLC, however, managed to eek out a 1% improvement. BMW was up a percent as well, while Honda America remained flat. Nissan North America fell 2.4% in sales, and even Toyota Motor Co. couldn't pull out a win, falling 1.7%. <br /><br />Since there were the same amount of selling days last month as there were in December 2006, the figures below represent both the change in raw number of units sold and the daily average sales rate. <br /><br /><strong>Biggest Winner</strong><br />MINI <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/__up_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />44% at 3,562 (12/06: 2,472)<br /><br /><strong>Biggest Loser</strong><br />Mitsubishi <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/__down_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />-40.4% at 5,904 (12/06: 9,910)<br /><br /><strong>BRANDS</strong><br />Acura <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/__down_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />-7.7% at 17,582 (12/06: 19,056)<br />Audi <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/__down_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />-29% at 8,502 (12/06: 11,897)<br />BMW <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/__down_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />-2.4% at 30,199 (12/06: 30,945)<br />Buick <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/__down_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />-9.9% at 14,400 (12/06: 15,986)<br />Cadillac <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/__down_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />-5.6% at 21,436 (12/06: 22,715)<br />Chevrolet <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/__down_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />-4.5% at 185,626 (12/06: 194,369)<br />Chrysler <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/__down_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />-13% at 48,384 (12/06: 55,839)<br />Dodge <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/__up_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />11% at 92,235 (12/06: 88,489)<br />Ford <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/__down_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />-9.0% at 173,648 (12/06: 190,914)<br />GMC <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/__up_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />8.9% at 45,503 (12/06: 41,770)<br />Honda <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/__up_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />1.3% at 114,210 (12/06: 112,722)<br />HUMMER <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/__down_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />-23% at 5,333 (12/06: 6,928)<br />Hyundai <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/__up_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />24.2% at 46,487 (12/06: 37,365)<br />Infiniti <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/__down_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />-3.5% at 12,655 (12/06: 13,112)<br />Jaguar <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/__down_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />-2.0% at 1,522 (12/06: 1,553)<br />Jeep <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/__down_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />-3.0% at 44,804 (12/06: 46,087)<br />Kia <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/__down_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />-19.8% at 24,068 (12/06: 30,004)<br />Land Rover <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/__down_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />-18.7% at 4,887 (12/06: 6,014)<br />Lexus <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/__down_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />-7.2% at 34,555 (12/06: 37,235)<br />Lincoln <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/__down_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />-21.4% at 10,065 (12/06: 12,806)<br />Mazda <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/__up_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />25% at 24,933 (12/06: 19,912)<br />Mercedes <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/__down_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />-2.9% at 27,301 (12/06: 28,115)<br />Mercury <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/__down_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />-8.5% at 12,631 (12/06: 13,809)<br />MINI <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/__up_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />44% at 3,562 (12/06: 2,472)<br />Mitsubishi <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/__down_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />-40.4% at 5,904 (12/06: 9,910)<br />Nissan <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/__down_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />-2.2% at 76,900 (12/06: 78,663)<br />Pontiac <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/__down_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />-7.8% at 30,211 (12/06: 32,772)<br />Porsche <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/__down_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />-2.0% at 2,891 (12/06: 2,947)<br />Saab <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/__down_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />-22.3% at 2,748 (12/06: 3,535)<br />Saturn <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/__down_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />-12% at 18,196 (12/06: 20,686)<br />Subaru<img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/__down_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />-9.1% at 18,739 (12/06: 20,613)<br />Suzuki <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/__up_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />0.6% at 7,361 (12/06: 7,317)<br />Toyota <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/__down_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />-0.7% at 189,844 (12/06: 191,087)<br />Volkswagen <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/__up_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />3.0% at 20,543 (12/06: 19,942)<br />Volvo <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/__up_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />9.6% at 9,341 (12/06: 8,525)<br /><br /><strong>COMPANIES</strong><br />BMW Group <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/__up_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />1.0% at 33,761 (12/06: 33,417)<br />Chrysler Group <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/__up_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />1.0% at 191,423 (12/06: 190,415)<br />Ford Motor Co <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/__down_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />-9.2% at 212,094 (12/06: 233,621)<br />General Motors <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/__down_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />-5.2% at 323,453 (12/06: 341,327)<br />Honda America <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/__up_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />0.0% at 131,792 (12/06: 131,778)<br />Nissan North America <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/__down_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />-2.4% at 89,555 (12/06: 91,775)<br />Toyota Motor Co. <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/__down_arrow.jpg"  alt="" />-1.7% at 224,399 (12/06: 228,322)<p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;">&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/01/03/by-the-numbers-december-2007/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1076703/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/01/03/by-the-numbers-december-2007/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p><hr />]]></description><category>by the numbers</category><category>by the numbers december 2007</category><category>ByTheNumbers</category><category>ByTheNumbersDecember2007</category><category>december 2007 auto sales</category><category>december 2007 sales</category><category>December2007AutoSales</category><category>December2007Sales</category><category>featured</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Neff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>2008-01-03T17:05:00+00:00</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[By the Numbers: November 2007]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/03/by-the-numbers-november-2007/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/03/by-the-numbers-november-2007/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/03/by-the-numbers-november-2007/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/earnings-financials/" rel="tag">Earnings/Financials</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/by-the-numbers/" rel="tag">By the Numbers</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/12/hill_car1a.png" />The November sales numbers are in and by far the biggest news is that Ford Motor Company sales actually rose 0.4% last month. While not a huge jump, the automaker deserved of a little green arrow next to its name nonetheless.<br /><br />General Motors, however, fell 11.4%, with every single one of its brands reporting a loss. Toyota narrowly eeked out a positive number, with sales up just 0.3%. Honda and Nissan fared well, with sales up 4.7% and 6.1%, respectively. Chrysler LLC, meanwhile, fell 2%.<br /><br />The other bit of surprising news is that Mercury is our Biggest Winner this month, with sales that rose an impressive 27.6%. Credit goes to the Grand Marquis (up 90.4% at 4,702) and the Milan (up 42.7% at 3,449) for the brand's performance last month, though we're not taking back our crack that Mercury's just a well-defined trim level. <br /><br />Check out the Biggest Winner and Loser <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/03/by-the-numbers-november-2007/">after the jump</a>, along with our notes on individual models. You can also view past monthly sales figures by viewing our <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/by-the-numbers/">By the Numbers category</a>.<br /><br /><strong>BRANDS</strong><br />Acura <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/12/__down_arrow.jpg" />-24.9% at 12,910 (11/06: 17,200)<br />Audi <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/12/__down_arrow.jpg" />-1.1% at 9,104 (11/06: 9,209)<br />BMW <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/12/__up_arrow.jpg" />5.3% at 23,808 (11/06: 22,602)<br />Buick <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/12/__down_arrow.jpg" />-26.8% at 13,245 (11/06: 18,089)<br />Cadillac <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/12/__down_arrow.jpg" />-1.2% at 17,041 (11/06: 17,250)<br />Chevrolet <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/12/__down_arrow.jpg" />-11.3% at 151,642 (11/06: 171,003)<br />Chrysler <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/12/__down_arrow.jpg" />-13% at 45,510 (11/06: 52,400)<br />Dodge <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/12/__up_arrow.jpg" />6% at 80,670 (11/06: 76,371)<br />Ford <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/12/__down_arrow.jpg" />-0.3% at 147,310 (11/06: 147,791)<br />GMC <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/12/__down_arrow.jpg" />-7.7% at 34,549 (11/06: 37,440)<br />Honda <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/12/__up_arrow.jpg" />10.4% at 98,521 (11/06: 89,246)<br />HUMMER <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/12/__down_arrow.jpg" />-30.5% at 4,029 (11/06: 5,795)<br />Hyundai <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/12/__up_arrow.jpg" />12% at 31,883 (11/06: 28,417)<br />Infiniti <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/12/__up_arrow.jpg" />2.1% at 10,604 (11/06: 10,382)<br />Jaguar <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/12/__down_arrow.jpg" />-11.3% at 1,114 (11/06: 1,256)<br />Jeep <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/12/__down_arrow.jpg" />-2% at 34,908 (11/06: 35,785)<br />Kia <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/12/__up_arrow.jpg" />8.9% at 24,177 (11/06: 22,203)<br />Land Rover <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/12/__up_arrow.jpg" />2.9% at 4,352 (11/06: 4,229)<br />Lexus <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/12/__down_arrow.jpg" />-7.0% at 24,848 (11/06: 26,719)<br />Lincoln <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/12/__down_arrow.jpg" />-7.1% at 8,744 (11/06: 9,410)<br />Mazda <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/12/__down_arrow.jpg" />-1.0% at 20,580 (11/06: 20,792)<br />Mercedes <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/12/__up_arrow.jpg" />3.4% at 22,819 (11/06: 22,079)<br />Mercury <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/12/__up_arrow.jpg" />27.6% at 13,204 (11/06: 10,344)<br />MINI <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/12/__up_arrow.jpg" />3.3% at 3,177 (11/06: 3,287)<br />Mitsubishi <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/12/__up_arrow.jpg" />13.8% at 7,983 (11/06: 9,256) <br />Nissan <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/12/__up_arrow.jpg" />6.8% at 70,079 (11/06: 65,633)<br />Pontiac <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/12/__down_arrow.jpg" />-0.4% at 26,040 (11/06: 26,154)<br />Porsche <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/12/__up_arrow.jpg" />1.9% at 2,662 (11/06: 2,611)<br />Saab <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/12/__down_arrow.jpg" />-19.8% at 2,003 (11/06: 2,497)<br />Saturn <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/12/__down_arrow.jpg" />-17% at 15,105 (11/06: 18,190)<br />Subaru <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/12/__down_arrow.jpg" />-5.9% at 14,868 (11/06: 15,800)<br />Toyota <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/12/__up_arrow.jpg" />1.4% at 172,341 (11/06: 169,976)<br />Volkswagen <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/12/__up_arrow.jpg" />3.6% at 17,689 (11/06: 17,082)<br />Volvo <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/12/__down_arrow.jpg" />-10.9% at 8,227 (11/06: 9,229)<br /><br />N/A: Suzuki<br /><br /><strong>COMPANIES</strong><br />BMW Group <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/12/__up_arrow.jpg" />4.2% at 26,985 (11/06: 25,889)<br />Chrysler LLC <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/12/__down_arrow.jpg" />-2% at 161,088 (11/06: 164,556) <br />Ford Motor Co <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/12/__up_arrow.jpg" />0.4% at 182,951 (11/06: 182,259)<br />General Motors <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/12/__down_arrow.jpg" />-11.4% at 263,654 (11/06: 297,556)<br />Honda America <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/12/__up_arrow.jpg" />4.7% at 111,431 (11/06: 106,446)<br />Nissan North America <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/12/__up_arrow.jpg" />6.1% at 80,683 (11/06: 76,015)<br />Toyota Motor Co. <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/12/__up_arrow.jpg" />0.3% at 197,189 (11/06: 196,695)<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/03/by-the-numbers-november-2007/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>By the Numbers: November 2007</em></a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;">&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/03/by-the-numbers-november-2007/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1053863/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/03/by-the-numbers-november-2007/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p><hr />]]></description><category>by the numbers november 2007</category><category>ByTheNumbersNovember2007</category><category>featured</category><category>sales november 2007</category><category>SalesNovember2007</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Neff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>2007-12-03T15:55:00+00:00</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[By the Numbers: October 2007]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/11/02/by-the-numbers-october-2007/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/11/02/by-the-numbers-october-2007/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/11/02/by-the-numbers-october-2007/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/earnings-financials/" rel="tag">Earnings/Financials</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/by-the-numbers/" rel="tag">By the Numbers</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/11/hill_car1a.png" />Apologies for the tardiness in delivering our By the Numbers post this month, but we're here with it now and all the automakers have reported their numbers. Big picture, ups and downs in the industry appear about even, so perhaps October 2007 was a wash. General Motors sales fell 1.1% compared to October of last year, while Toyota Motor Co. sales rose by only 0.5%. <br /><br />GM was led by a resurgent Cadillac (up 19.9%), bullish GMC (up 10.2%) and a Chevrolet that held its own (up 0.6%). Ford and Chrysler, meanwhile, both stumbled hard, falling 13% and 12.4% respectively compared to last year. With only an 8% increase this month in the number of Wranglers sold, Jeep's only popular model just couldn't save the brand this time, which saw its rate of sales slow to 24% below last year's levels. <br /><br />Standouts of the month include Nissan North America, which increased its daily average sales rate by 8.8% last month, and Kia, our Biggest Winner of the month, which rose by 20.5%. Big props to Mazda and Mercury as well, both big winners in October with DSRs that rose 13.3% and 20.2%, respectively.<br /><br /><strong>Biggest Winner</strong><br />Kia <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/11/__up_arrow.jpg" />20.5% at 25,185 (10/06: 20,097)<br /><br /><strong>Biggest Loser</strong><br />HUMMER <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/11/__down_arrow.jpg" />-33.2% at 3,864 (10/06: 5,565)<br /><br /><strong>BRANDS</strong><br />Acura <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/11/__down_arrow.jpg" />-22% at 12,886 (10/06: 15,877)<br />Audi <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/11/__up_arrow.jpg" />10.9% at 7,421 (10/06: 6,431)<br />BMW <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/11/__up_arrow.jpg" />8.3% at 23,451 (10/06: 20,822) <br />Buick <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/11/__down_arrow.jpg" />-12% at 14,231 (10/06: 15,541)<br />Cadillac <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/11/__up_arrow.jpg" />19.9% at 21,267 (10/06: 17,052)<br />Chevrolet <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/11/__up_arrow.jpg" />0.6% at 179,825 (10/06: 171,890)<br />Chrysler<img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/11/__down_arrow.jpg" /> -6.6% at 40,440 (10/06: 41,635)<br />Dodge <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/11/__down_arrow.jpg" />-9.6% at 73,020 (10/06: 77,654)<br />Ford <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/11/__down_arrow.jpg" />-16.4% at 159,361 (10/06: 183,188)<br />GMC <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/11/__up_arrow.jpg" />10.2% at 44,456 (10/06: 38,776)<br />H