Add your comments
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br> tags.
Please note that gratuitous links to your site are viewed as spam and may result in removed comments.
GM shrinks Volt's gas tank, range drops from 600 to 360 miles
MINI dealers to sell Alfa Romeos in the U.S.
Honda to reveal OSM open-top concept in London
With crisis looming, GM may unveil Volt for 100th anniversary
Next BMW M5 will nix V10 in favor of twin-turbo V8
In the Autoblog Garage: 2009 Lincoln MKS
Track Test: 2008 Roush 427R Trak Pak Mustang
In the Autoblog Garage: 2008 Porsche Cayman S
First Drive: 2009 Chevrolet Traverse
In the Autoblog Garage: 2008 Mazda MX-5 Miata Retractable Hard Top
Reader Comments for
Subscribe to this thread(Page 1 of 1)
gtluis @ Jun 10th 2006 10:24PM
My thoughts are on the same lines, Lithous. GM is not behind in hybrid technology, but they haven't put out enough hybrids is more the issue than anything. GM has developed hybrid technology more for industry until now.
Ethanol is a play to get good message about GM's vision of a cleaner environment. Frankly, it's more original and effective if they lead that way in the PR race than give Toyota even more credit than it's due for hybrids. Hybrid and Ethanol vehicles are good transitional technologies but not the best options, I think. Diesel technology is more likely to have better results and be more economical for consumers in the near future.